How Cost of Living Impacts Casting Opportunities

The cost of living directly influences an actor’s ability to pursue their career. High living expenses in major entertainment hubs like Los Angeles, New York City, and Atlanta often limit time and resources for auditions, training, and networking. Here’s a quick breakdown of how these financial pressures shape casting opportunities:

• High Costs in Major Cities: Rent in Los Angeles averages $2,600/month, while New York City can exceed $3,500. Atlanta offers lower rents (~$1,800/month) but is still pricier than smaller markets.
• Smaller Markets Trade-Off: Affordable cities like Albuquerque or Austin ($900–$1,300/month for rent) have fewer casting opportunities, mostly non-union roles with lower pay.
• Union vs. Non-Union Work: Union projects dominate high-cost areas, offering better pay but requiring actors to cover steep living and professional expenses.
• Audition Costs: In-person auditions in cities like LA or NYC can cost $20–$50 per trip, while self-tapes have reduced some financial burdens.

Actors must carefully balance location, expenses, and opportunities. Tools like self-tapes and platforms such as CastmeNow help actors in smaller markets access nationwide roles, reducing the need to relocate to expensive cities.

Key Insight: Success in acting isn’t about living in the most expensive city - it’s about managing finances wisely, leveraging technology, and finding the right balance between opportunities and affordability.

How Living Costs Affect Casting Opportunities by Region

Living costs don’t just determine how affordable housing is - they also play a big role in shaping casting opportunities across different regions.

Major Cities vs. Smaller Markets

In the U.S., acting opportunities tend to cluster in major cities, while affordability often lies in smaller markets. Cities like Los Angeles, New York City, and Atlanta dominate the entertainment industry, hosting the bulk of film, television, and commercial productions. These three states - California, New York, and Georgia - regularly top the charts for production volume and spending.

Los Angeles offers actors access to a vast array of projects, from union to non-union, spanning film, TV, streaming platforms, and commercials. With a dense network of agents, casting directors, and managers, it’s a hub that’s tough to replicate elsewhere. New York City provides similar advantages, particularly for theater and television, while Atlanta has become a powerhouse for streaming series and cable productions.

But all this opportunity comes at a cost. A one-bedroom apartment in Los Angeles averages about $2,600 per month, far above the national average. In New York City, rents often exceed $3,500 in many neighborhoods. Even Atlanta, at around $1,800 per month, is significantly pricier than smaller markets.

Smaller cities in states like Ohio, Missouri, or parts of Texas offer far more affordable housing, with one-bedroom apartments typically ranging from $900 to $1,300 per month. However, these areas come with fewer casting opportunities, mostly limited to local theater, regional commercials, student films, and small independent productions. Pay rates in these markets are often lower, and non-union roles dominate, meaning actors have fewer protections and benefits.

For many performers, the decision is a trade-off. Major cities offer more auditions and the potential for higher earnings but come with steep living expenses. Smaller markets, while easier on the wallet, often require actors to travel for work or accept fewer, lower-paying roles. States like New Mexico and Louisiana provide a middle ground, using film tax credits to attract productions while maintaining a lower cost of living than traditional entertainment hubs. These regional differences also influence whether union or non-union work is more prevalent.

Union vs. Non-Union Work by Location

Union work is heavily concentrated in high-cost areas. SAG-AFTRA projects, for example, are most common in cities like Los Angeles, New York City, Atlanta, Chicago, and parts of New Mexico - places with established studio infrastructure and industry support systems. While union work provides better pay and protections, it often ties actors to the higher living expenses of these cities.

Union projects, such as national commercials, Broadway productions, and high-end voiceover work, generally pay at or above the SAG-AFTRA scale. By contrast, smaller or regional markets are dominated by non-union roles, including local theater, regional ads, student films, and ultra-low-budget independent projects. Union membership itself comes with costs: annual dues typically range from $170 to $230, plus initiation fees. These expenses, combined with the cost of living in major cities, make pursuing union work a financial challenge for many actors. In-person auditions further add to this burden.

The Cost of In-Person Auditions

Even landing an audition comes with its own set of expenses. In Los Angeles, attending an audition can cost between $20 and $50 when factoring in gas, parking, tolls, and vehicle maintenance. In New York City, actors face similar costs through public transit fares, rideshares, or the occasional cab ride.

Time is another cost. Commuting to auditions in major cities often takes an hour or more each way. While smaller markets may require less travel, they also offer far fewer opportunities.

On top of transportation, maintaining a professional wardrobe can strain an actor’s budget. When rent and other basic expenses eat up most of their income, these recurring costs for auditions can become a significant hurdle.

As a Casting Networks article puts it, actors in expensive cities have "less wiggle room financially to invest into your creative career", as rising rents and daily expenses compete with budgets for auditions and training.

While self-tapes and remote auditions have reduced some of these costs, in-person callbacks, chemistry reads, and certain bookings still require actors to show up. This ensures that financial challenges remain a constant consideration for anyone navigating an acting career in these regions.

Financial Pressures Actors Face in Expensive Markets

We’ve already covered the challenges of housing and audition costs, but there’s more to the financial puzzle for actors. Beyond the basics like rent and groceries, working in high-cost cities brings a host of professional expenses that don’t go away, even during slow periods.

Industry Expenses Beyond Rent

Pursuing an acting career isn’t just about talent - it’s also about constant investment. Here’s a breakdown of some common costs:

• Headshots: $200–$500 per session, updated every couple of years.
• Casting website subscriptions: $60–$300 annually.
• Union fees: $170–$230 in annual dues, plus initiation fees.
• Acting classes: $100–$500 per session.
• Self-tape equipment: Around $400 for a basic setup.

On top of that, actors need to maintain audition-appropriate wardrobes and cover transportation costs for in-person auditions, whether it’s gas, parking, tolls, or public transit. When you add it all up, these expenses can easily total $2,000–$5,000 or more each year. And that’s before factoring in basic living costs. In cities where rent eats up 40% to 60% of income, these professional expenses often push actors to take on additional jobs, leaving less time for auditions.

How Rising Costs Reduce Audition Availability

The financial squeeze from rising rents and inflation forces many actors to work longer hours just to make ends meet. For example, an actor in Los Angeles who once worked 20 hours a week in a service job might now need to clock 30 to 40 hours. This leaves little flexibility for auditions or accepting low-paying roles like indie films, small theater gigs, or student projects that could help build their resumes.

Casting directors have observed that actors with more flexible schedules - often those with savings or lower living expenses - are better positioned to secure roles, especially for last-minute opportunities. This creates a vicious cycle: financial pressures limit audition availability, which in turn limits career growth.

Tools to Compare Market Costs

Before committing to a high-cost market - or deciding whether to relocate - actors can use various tools to compare living expenses across different cities. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) provides regional price parities, which highlight how the cost of goods and services varies across metro areas. This can help actors see how far their income might stretch in one city versus another.

Online cost-of-living calculators from sites like Bankrate, NerdWallet, and SmartAsset allow for side-by-side comparisons of expenses like housing, groceries, utilities, transportation, and healthcare. For more real-time data, housing platforms like Zillow or Apartments.com, along with gas price trackers and transit websites, can help actors estimate monthly costs more accurately.

For those earning a similar income, relocating from cities like Los Angeles or New York to more affordable markets - such as Atlanta or Albuquerque - can significantly cut down on rent and transportation expenses. With lower financial stress, actors may find it easier to focus on auditions, training, and networking, ultimately opening up more opportunities to advance their careers.

Choosing Where to Live Based on Market and Cost

Where you choose to live as an actor isn’t just about geography - it’s about balancing your budget with opportunities. Your location directly impacts how you manage expenses while chasing your career goals. The trick is finding a sweet spot between audition access and affordable living.

Comparing Major Hubs and Regional Markets

Let’s break it down: big cities like Los Angeles and New York City are brimming with network television, streaming series, and studio films. These hubs cast hundreds of union projects every year, with SAG-AFTRA day rates starting at about $1,082 for television day players. But with more auditions come higher competition - and steeper living costs. For instance, renting a one-bedroom apartment in Los Angeles averages $2,500 per month, while New York City often exceeds that, depending on the borough.

On the other hand, regional markets like Atlanta are on the rise. Atlanta offers a healthy mix of film, television, and commercial work. While there may be fewer projects overall, many actors report booking a higher percentage of their auditions. Plus, the cost of living is far more manageable. A one-bedroom apartment in Atlanta averages $1,400 per month - saving you about $1,100 monthly compared to Los Angeles. That’s an extra $13,200 a year you could put toward acting classes, headshots, or even an emergency fund.

Smaller markets like Austin or Albuquerque focus more on regional commercials, indie films, and theater. Non-union day rates in these areas range from $100 to $500, which is lower than union minimums in major hubs. However, for newer actors, these markets can be a great place to build experience and credits without the financial pressure of a costly day job.

The type of work you’re aiming for also matters. New York City is the epicenter for theater, with Broadway and Off-Broadway productions galore. Los Angeles dominates in national commercials and film opportunities, while Atlanta has become a major hub for both network and streaming content. Meanwhile, regional markets often lean toward local commercials and indie projects.

Hybrid Approaches to Balance Costs and Access

If living full-time in a high-cost city feels overwhelming, consider a hybrid approach. Many actors choose to live in a more affordable city and travel to major hubs during peak casting seasons. This strategy keeps fixed costs low while still giving you access to big opportunities.

For example, an actor living in Phoenix or San Diego can drive to Los Angeles during pilot season (January through April) without committing to year-round high rents. Similarly, actors based in Philadelphia or Boston can make quick trips to New York City for auditions or callbacks. Short-term housing options, ranging from $800 to $1,200 per month, are far cheaper than renting a full-time apartment in these cities.

Some actors even temporarily relocate to high-opportunity cities for six months to a year to build connections with casting directors, agents, and fellow actors. Once they’ve established relationships, they return to a more affordable base while maintaining those networks through periodic visits and remote self-tape submissions.

To make hybrid strategies work, you’ll need to budget for travel and temporary housing. For example, four trips per year at $400 for travel and $1,000 for accommodations would cost about $5,600 annually - far less than paying full-time rent in a high-cost city. Planning ahead and booking travel early can make this approach even more manageable.

Market Comparison Table

Here’s a quick look at how different markets stack up:

This table highlights the trade-offs: while high-cost markets offer more opportunities and better pay rates, the living expenses can eat into your earnings. Mid-cost markets strike a balance between casting volume and affordability, while low-cost markets stretch your income further but may require more patience to build your resume.

Leveraging Remote Submissions

Platforms like CastmeNow (Cast Me Now) are game-changers for actors in affordable markets. By automating submissions and connecting to casting profiles like Casting Networks and Actors Access, tools like these let you apply to roles nationwide without the expense of constant travel. This means you can stay budget-conscious while still accessing opportunities in major hubs.

Ultimately, your career stage and personal finances should guide your decision. Newer actors might thrive in mid- or low-cost markets where they can focus on training and building credits without the stress of overwhelming expenses. Mid-career actors with representation may want to invest time in major hubs or adopt a hybrid approach to pursue higher-paying opportunities. Established actors often have the flexibility to live where they choose, relying on their networks and remote submissions to stay in the game.

Using Technology to Overcome Cost Barriers

Technology has transformed how actors access opportunities, especially for those navigating the financial challenges of pursuing a career in entertainment. With living expenses often creating significant hurdles, innovations like remote submissions, self-tapes, and automation tools have made it possible for performers to compete in major markets without the need to relocate or endure constant travel for auditions.

Remote Submissions and Self-Tapes

One of the most impactful changes in casting is the rise of remote submissions and self-tapes. Since 2020, these methods have become the go-to for initial auditions in U.S. film, television, and commercial casting. This shift allows actors in cities with lower living costs to audition for projects in major hubs like Los Angeles, New York, and Atlanta without moving until later stages, such as callbacks or bookings.

Platforms like Actors Access, Casting Networks, and Backstage make it easy to submit to projects across the country. A 2022 Backstage industry survey revealed that most casting directors now rely on self-tapes for initial rounds, with some reporting nearly all early auditions are handled remotely. This trend levels the playing field, enabling an actor in Austin or Albuquerque to audition for the same roles as someone living in high-cost areas like Manhattan.

The financial benefits are undeniable. In-person auditions come with costs like gas, tolls, rideshares, public transit fares, and sometimes even hotel stays or meals for out-of-town auditions - not to mention potential lost wages from taking time off work. Self-tapes, on the other hand, require only a one-time investment in basic equipment. A simple setup with a smartphone or DSLR, tripod, affordable lighting ($25–$80), a plain backdrop ($30–$100), and a microphone ($25–$150) is often enough. Casting directors emphasize that good lighting, clear sound, and proper framing matter more than expensive gear - a well-lit corner of your home can work wonders.

Self-tapes also offer more flexibility. You can record at your convenience, re-shoot until you're satisfied (within deadlines), and even batch auditions in a single session. This is especially helpful for actors balancing demanding day jobs or living in different time zones from major casting markets.

Managing Time and Applications to Save Money

Beyond reducing travel costs, technology helps actors streamline how they manage their time and auditions. Since time is money, it’s essential to approach auditions as strategic investments. Rather than applying to every role, focus on opportunities that align with your goals - whether that’s securing well-paying jobs, building a strong résumé, or forming valuable industry connections.

Start by setting clear criteria: define your target market (union television roles, indie films, commercials, etc.), establish acceptable pay ranges, and identify roles that align with your personal brand. Use filters for role type, age range, pay scale, and location to ensure you’re applying only to the opportunities that truly fit.

To save time, dedicate specific blocks of your week to submissions and self-taping instead of constantly refreshing casting websites. Many actors find success by batching tasks - setting aside a couple of evenings for recording, editing, and uploading. Tracking your efforts with a simple spreadsheet can help you see which types of projects or markets yield the best results, allowing you to focus your energy where it matters most.

How CastmeNow Helps Actors Stay Competitive

Even with self-tapes and remote submissions, the sheer number of opportunities can feel overwhelming - especially for actors juggling long hours or living far from major entertainment hubs. Here’s where automation tools like CastmeNow (Cast Me Now) come into play.

CastmeNow works as an automation layer that integrates with platforms like Casting Networks and Actors Access. It scans for roles that match your preferences and submits applications on your behalf, 24/7. This ensures you stay active in the casting process even when you’re busy working or sleeping.

The system tailors submissions to your specific needs, taking into account factors like union status, pay rates, desired locations, and role types. It also analyzes your profile - headshots, reels, credits, and skills - to identify the best opportunities. This is especially helpful for actors in high-cost cities who need to work extra hours to cover expenses, as well as for performers in smaller markets who want to access larger opportunities without relocating. By automating the submission process, CastmeNow reduces the time spent on manual applications and eases the financial pressures of pursuing acting.

Actors using CastmeNow report impressive results: collectively saving over 5,000 hours, securing 10 times more auditions, and averaging over 100 roles auto-submitted weekly. For those in expensive cities, automation helps balance the demands of a day job with auditioning. Over time, this efficiency can lead to more opportunities and bookings with less personal effort.

The platform offers a free 30-day trial with full access to its features, requiring no credit card to sign up. After the trial, the Basic Plan costs $3 per month (auto-applying to up to 10 roles daily), while the Unlimited Plan, at $8 per month, provides unlimited submissions, access to over 25 automation tools, and an advanced role-matching algorithm.

Manual Submissions vs. CastmeNow Automation

This comparison underscores how automation can be a game-changer for actors under financial strain. Whether you're managing a hectic schedule in a high-cost city or trying to break into bigger markets from a more affordable location, tools like CastmeNow make it easier to stay in the game without sacrificing your income or well-being.

Conclusion

Building a long-term acting career often hinges on how well your location supports both your audition access and financial stability. It's not about finding a "perfect" city but about making smart decisions that balance market opportunities with living costs and your personal budget.

Actors thriving across the U.S. treat location as a calculated career move. This involves creating realistic monthly budgets that factor in essentials like rent, transportation, food, union dues, casting site fees, classes, and self-tape equipment. It also means researching the types of projects that dominate specific markets - whether it’s commercials in Chicago, indie films in Austin, or television in Atlanta - and deciding if the volume of opportunities justifies the cost of living in that area. This kind of thoughtful planning is essential when comparing high-cost hubs to more affordable, mid-size markets.

Financial constraints don’t have to limit your career if you plan carefully. In expensive cities like Los Angeles and New York, actors often share housing to save on rent, rely on public transit, and prioritize spending on the most relevant casting platforms and training instead of trying to pay for everything. On the other hand, actors in more affordable markets can use self-tapes and remote submissions to access roles in bigger cities without needing to relocate, turning travel into an occasional expense rather than a constant financial strain. These strategies, combined with modern technology, help actors stay competitive regardless of their location.

Technology has revolutionized casting. Self-tapes allow you to audition from anywhere, remote submissions open up national opportunities, and tools like CastmeNow (Cast Me Now) integrate with platforms like Casting Networks and Actors Access to automate submissions 24/7. This means you can maintain a high volume of auditions whether you’re working long hours in a high-cost city or living in a smaller market and targeting larger hubs.

Take these two examples: an actor in Los Angeles sharing a two-bedroom apartment and working a flexible service job stays active in auditions through automation and self-tapes. Meanwhile, an actor in a mid-size city with lower rent focuses on local gigs while pursuing occasional projects in LA or NYC remotely. Both strategies highlight how careful financial planning and smart use of technology can keep auditions flowing, no matter the market.

Success isn’t about moving to the most expensive city - it’s about creating a setup that works for both your craft and your finances. Whether you’re in a major hub or a smaller market, understanding cost dynamics, budgeting wisely, choosing your location thoughtfully, and leveraging technology can all help you sustain your career. Your location may influence your options, but your strategy is what keeps your career on track.

FAQs

How can actors manage the high cost of living in major cities while pursuing casting opportunities?

Living in big cities often means better access to casting opportunities, but it also comes with a hefty price tag. To help manage this, actors can simplify their job hunt with tools like CastmeNow. This platform automates the application process, cutting down on the time and energy spent searching for roles.

By taking care of repetitive tasks, actors can free up more time to focus on honing their craft, all while staying active in their careers. This approach can make it easier to juggle both financial responsibilities and professional aspirations, even in expensive urban areas.

How can actors in smaller markets find opportunities in major entertainment hubs without moving?

Actors based in smaller markets can still land roles in major entertainment hubs by tapping into online platforms and networking effectively. Websites like Casting Networks and Actors Access keep you connected to casting opportunities in larger cities, no matter where you are. For a time-saving boost, tools like CastmeNow can automate the application process, submitting for roles that match your preferences without requiring constant manual effort.

Beyond casting platforms, building relationships with industry insiders is key. Engage with professionals through virtual events, online workshops, or even social media. Staying active and visible online not only showcases your talent but also ensures you remain on the radar for new opportunities - regardless of your location.

How do remote submissions and self-tapes help actors save money and access more casting opportunities?

The rise of remote submissions and self-tapes has transformed the audition process for actors. No longer tied to expensive travel or mandatory in-person meetings, actors can now audition from virtually anywhere. This shift not only cuts down on costs but also opens doors to a broader range of opportunities, regardless of where they’re based.

Platforms like CastmeNow take this convenience a step further. By automating applications and linking directly to casting profiles, these tools match actors with roles that align with their preferences. The result? Actors can dedicate more energy to perfecting their craft instead of juggling the logistical challenges of the audition process.

Related Blog Posts

• How Casting Automation Improves Metrics
• How Casting Automation Handles High Volume Roles
• Study: Impact of Automation on Casting Success
• Emerging Roles in 2025: Insights from Reports